Σάββατο 16 Μαρτίου 2013

The Meaning and Value of Sitting in Seiza

  Sitting in seiza is part of Japanese martial arts tradition, by sitting in seiza during Budo classes we demonstrate that we are participating in this tradition. For those who argue that seiza is something which suits Japanese bodies I recall Inaba Sensei lamenting that this generation of Japanese cannot sustain a conversation, in the polite sitting position of seiza for an hour, without losing concentration. Saito Sensei recounted that, during lectures given by Ueyshiba Sensei the junior grades were made to sit (in seiza) in the front row, the seniors sitting behind would thump them if they moved! I encourage my students to sit in seiza frequently, both in and out of the dojo, with an expectation that, by the time they achieve Shodan, they can sit for one hour.
   Why is it so important? In Budo culture, sitting seiza is a simple demonstration of respect. If you respect your teacher then, you sit seiza in front of him/her. If you respect your fellow Budo practitioners then, you sit seiza with them. If your teacher continues to sit seiza following the initial reiho at the beginning of the lesson then you continue to sit with them. This then becomes a kind of communing, a demonstration of mutual respect and of shared values. In seiza we can sit upright, with our spine erect, our rib cage open giving our internal organs space to function. We can balance our head and see clearly into the space about us without constriction to the neck – we are alert. So, we demonstrate what we feel – we are awake and receptive. We demonstrate to our teachers and our colleagues that we are in a state of balanced readiness.
   Perhaps there is also something of Shinto in sitting in seiza, alone or with others, in the dojo – it could be thought of as a small act of dedication. As seiza is rarely comfortable for anyone over long periods of time, there is an element of self-sacrifice to it; it costs us something to continue and raises the question of whether it is worth doing. Not all aspects of Budo are easy to digest, but we must taste everything Budo has to offer if we are to develop our pallet. Inaba Sensei stated (more than once) that, for him, Budo is not about what you can do to others but what you can endure yourself – through Budo we should aim to build physical and psychological resilience. For me seiza is the foundation stone from which to build this perspective on Budo.
   In seiza we can breathe into and expand our tanden and build a tangible sense of centre or centeredness. With our pelvis virtually on the ground we cannot help but feel the gravitational connection with the earth. With weight settled and breathing low in the abdomen we can also sense and build a dynamic stretch away from the ground, through the spine and up into the head. Through maintaining consistent pressure from our breath in the tanden, energy builds. We can also have an image of the spine as an energetic pathway with energy flowing in both directions. In this stationary but dynamic state we can begin to understand Doseiittai: movement in stillness/stillness in movement.
   The tanden can be imaged as a receptacle – gathering breath, gathering energy. It can also be imaged as a place to absorb discomfort so, any discomfort in knees, feet or back can be drained, if you like, into the tanden. The thing is to concentrate in the tanden so that the dominant sensation remains focused in the centre and not in disparate parts – centring is a process then, which requires effort and attention. The challenges that arise through sitting in seiza, are part of the process of distillation of a centre, and achieving a tangible sense of Tanden. If we cannot absorb discomforts which occur within us, how are we to cope with discomfiture or challenges that come from outside, created by circumstance or presented by others. From the perspective of seiza we can see Budo practice as a process of absorption at least equal and in balance with expression or technique, in fact here is the root of technique. When we have absorbed a grip or strike from an opponent into our tanden then, out of that concentrated or condensed energy, springs a response, a technique.
   It is useful to sit in seiza and breath if one has been under stress or are about to face a challenge. It is also worth sitting for some time, in a meditative state, simply as part of one’s research and development. Seiza is a good place to reflect on one’s state and redress energetic and emotional/psychological balance. It does, however, require some perseverance before the body adapts to this posture. For those people who find seiza difficult, I recommend sitting for short periods of time to begin with, perhaps while reading a few pages of a book or while eating breakfast then, gradually increase the time span. I have had many students who initially struggled with seiza, with discomfort in knees, ankles or feet, but who gradually built a capacity and taste for sitting (I do not advocate or encourage people with leg or lower back injuries to sit in seiza if it might exacerbate those injuries). If you continue to investigate the values of seiza, eventually you begin to tap into the benefits. This becomes a generative process – the more you sit, the more you notice the transformative potential.
   Tradition, manner, process and purpose become unified in seiza when we not only recognise the cultural tradition but sense and value the subjective process. Respect, or appreciation, then arises and grows naturally between people who embody the same values.

Τετάρτη 6 Μαρτίου 2013

Μαγικά χάπια αδυνατίσματος και αύξησης μυϊκής μάζας.


Μ Π Ο Υ Ρ Δ Ε Σ

Δεν υπάρχει τίποτα τέτοιο. Μην πετάτε τα λεφτά σας και πιθανώς κάνετε κακό στην υγεία σας.

Μία και μοναδική μέθοδος υπάρχει. Η αερόβια προπόνηση, τα βάρη και η σωστή δίαιτα. Οτιδήποτε άλλο είναι παραμύθι.

Καταλαβαίνω ότι πιθανόν να σας χαλάω τα όνειρα αλλά δεν υπάρχει τίποτε άλλο.

Πετάξτε τσάγια, κετόνες, χελωνόσουπες και γλαρόσουπες και επικεντρωθείτε στον στόχο σας.

Για δίαιτα δείτε εδώ     Η απόλυτη δίαιτα

Παρασκευή 1 Μαρτίου 2013

What is Aikido?

All over the world people used to fight with sword, spears and other weapons. When they had no weapons at hand, they boxed or wrestled. These techniques of fighting were almost the same all over the world until the invention of guns. The use of guns for fighting completely changed the way wars were fought. The Portuguese imported guns into Japan in 1543. The Japanese quickly started to make guns for themselves. Around 1590 guns were being used for fighting in wars and were proving to be more efficient than traditional weapons. The use of guns was still limited because of limited fabrication.
About 1600 Japan was dominated by the Tokugawa clan who succeeded in creating a system of domination by samurai. In order to stabilize their dominance, the production and use of guns was prohibited along with communication with the outside world. This gave an opportunity to develop fighting methods without the use of guns for approximately 250 years whilst, in Europe, guns were developed as the main weapon of fighting.
After 1800 Europeans started to colonize China. Europeans were not initially interested in Japan since it was small in comparison to China. The United States also wanted to participate in the colonization of China and planned to use Japan as a port before arriving in China. Around 1860 the US navy came to Japan and forced her to give them a port as their territory. Since European countries also wanted to use Japan as a port Japan was in danger of being colonized just like China. Japan decided to create a strong army in order to defend itself from the US and Europe. The use of the sword was prohibited and the army began to use guns.

Samurai clans, that kept the tradition of sword techniques, were unhappy with the ban and tried to preserve the practice. One way was to convert the traditions to a sport. This resulted in judo, kendo and later karate. University students supported these sporting types of martial arts. The martial arts that did not want to follow the sport way were called kobudo or jujitsu. One of the jujitsu was called Daitoryu Jujitsu and this is the technical basis of aikido. It is important to note that judo and karate techniques are derived from martial arts that do not use sword. That is why karate includes stick but not sword techniques. Kendo was based on sword techniques but became a sporting way. Daitoryu Jujitsu was created by someone who was good with sword techniques. He developed techniques without weapon using his ability of using the swords. Daitoryu Jujitsu techniques are therefore very different from judo or karate techniques while rather similar to kendo techniques.

As the techniques of Daitoryu Jujitsu were practiced the original sword basis were forgotten in favour of an emphasis to street fighting. After World War II, there was a general idea that Japan should not fight and people should have neither guns nor sword. People began to think more of how street fights would be fought without weapons or maybe just with a stick or a knife. This situation gave birth to the new name of Aikido. The idea of aikido was to control a situation without fighting. This mentality corresponded to the tendency in US and Europe after 1960 and aikido started to get supported philosophically. The idea of resolving a conflict without fighting became a part of the philosophy of aikido.

This led to the idea of self-defence. What is self-defence? There is no difference between attack and defence. When one does certain actions toward the other, it is called attack. When the other does the same thing, it is called defence. Defence is permitted only when one is attacked. If the attack comes without a weapon, it is possible to wait until the attack comes and then do something about it. However if the attack is done with a gun or another highly developed weapon, it is almost impossible to defend oneself after the attack has started. One would have to shoot before being shot.

The question of knowing the intention of others now becomes important. If a person has a gun in his hand, a policeman will doubt his intention and will immediately demand him to drop his gun and put both hands up. If it is dark what should the policemen do? A policeman might be obliged to shoot before the possibility of being shot. The question would then arise as to whether the policeman correctly judged the situation or not.

It is more complicated if the attack and defence is between two countries. If a country is attacked but doesn’t know who attacked her then the country might assume that the attack is done by an enemy country and start to attack in the name of defence. Between two human beings, this would be called revenge and prohibited by law. Since the government punishes criminals, victims do not have to resort to revenge. Since there is no authority above two countries revenge is permitted. It is not easy to distinguish between revenge and defence. The whole problem comes because the act of attack, revenge, and defence are the same. It is only a matter of interpretation.

In aikido it is possible to create a completely new philosophy. Aikido does not have to be a self-defence. Defence is the same as attack. Aikido is a way to create a situation where it is difficult to attack. If an attack does not happen, defence is not necessary. I think this is the only way for peace.


Doshu 

 http://www.ki-society.org.uk/articles/aikido.shtml